On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:48:13PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > As someone else mentioned, much of that particular backup run was > level 0. Lets do another experiment, what do you get (post it > please) when you do an "amadmin /config/ balance"?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# su amanda -c "amadmin DailySet1/ balance" bash: /root/.bashrc: Permission denied due-date #fs orig KB out KB balance ------------------------------------------- 2/24 Mon 0 0 0 --- 2/25 Tue 0 0 0 --- 2/26 Wed 1 1828210 1114735 -82.0% 2/27 Thu 1 21906920 19991316 +223.0% 2/28 Fri 17 19485440 9842074 +59.0% 3/01 Sat 0 0 0 --- 3/02 Sun 0 0 0 --- ------------------------------------------- TOTAL 19 43220570 30948125 6189625 (estimated 5 runs per dumpcycle) > Oh, and I've quit trying to reply to your email account as posted in > the messages you send because they always bounce from a different > address that apparently isn't accessable for incoming email. I've > had many bounced messages, and had to open the bounce to see where > I'd sent it because the address it bounced from was not an address > I'd sent anything to. Train up a spam filter, its easier than > antagonizing the people who are trying to help you. I would imagine that the "different address" would be postmaster@ my mail server... :-) Filtering is a waste of time. I'm sorry if you feel "antagonized", but I would submit that connections from the SMTP server you use are refused for a very good reason, and instead of shooting the messenger, you might want to consider looking into what that reason is and having it fixed. Besides, I don't ask for personal replies from a mailing list. *Nothing* annoys me more than to Google for a problem and find tons of references to the exact same problem I'm having, but no solutions because replies were emailed to the original poster instead of to the list where they could be archived... :-) > The email address that shows in the messages I send is real. As is mine... > And I > only get spam from two sources, my inbox, and an older computer > list I'm subscribed to. 99% of which goes straight to the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] & I don't see them other than scanning the folder for > filter upchucks before it all goes back out. Blindly bouncing spam to that address isn't accomplishing anything. IIRC, they don't even bother with it any more... they wound up with hundreds of millions of spam emails in their collection, enough to keep them occupied until sometime after the heat-death of the Universe. A couple of them will get light slaps on the wrist, and all of them will keep on spamming :-( -- John Oliver, CCNA http://www.john-oliver.net/ Linux/UNIX/network consulting http://www.john-oliver.net/resume/ *** sendmail, Apache, ftp, DNS, spam filtering *** **** Colocation, T1s, web/email/ftp hosting ****
