Are you saying that you are able to successfully
backup the Netapp without using the modified dump
program & using Amanda version earlier than 2.4.4 ?

If you are successfully able to do so, can you send me
your disklist for the Netapp part so that I can
compare with mine ?

The modified dump program for Netapp works fine for
smaller directories. But I'm using DDS4 tapes (20Gb
uncompressed) & my filesystem on the Netapp is about
90 Gb, so usually backups for the directories on the
Netapp that are greater than 20 Gb fail.

Thanks,

Ashwin.

--- Frank Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Thursday, June 12, 2003 14:56:18 -0600 George
> Kelbley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I may be missing something simple here, but, we
> want to back up a
> > Network Appliance using amanda.  2.4.4 seems to
> have patches to collect
> > the correct size, and I installed the perl scripts
> and dump program that
> > I found at
> www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc/amanda-netapp-dump-0.1/, but
> the dump
> > script exits with "cannot handle dump", and I
> think its because it
> > doesn't like the 'S' argument its getting from
> amanda.  
> > 
> > Since the 2.4.4 code has been patched for a
> NetApp, I'm assuming someone
> > is actually using it?
> 
> Never tried the ndmp stuff since I started using
> Amanda before it was
> included, so I NFS-mounted the NetApp filesystems on
> the backup server
> and treat them as local disks.  Probably not quite
> as fast, especially
> if you do client-compress and don't have a lot of
> CPU on the server, but
> it works.
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> --
> Frank Smith                                         
>    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Systems Administrator                               
>   Voice: 512-374-4673
> Hoover's Online                                     
>     Fax: 512-374-4501


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com

Reply via email to