On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:10:52PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > >If that is the case, why not use taper algo "largest"? > > > > ... . Remember, the > algorithm only takes into account dumps that are in the holding area at > the time sendaflush() is called, namely when a taper becomes idle (I > think), not all of the dumps as a whole (which is what I want).
You are correct of course, I was thinking it waited for all dumps to complete. New algo's LARGEST_WAIT, LARGESTFIT_WAIT ... :) -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
