On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:19:52AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: > Rohit wrote: > >From: "Jon LaBadie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>I don't think your assumption is correct. I think runspercycle > >>"ignores" the units part. So it was thinking you had a total of 5 > >>runs per dumpcycle. > > > > > >I read it somewhere it this mailing list that runspercycle does > >compute based on units specified. Also, amadmin balance command > >showed "estimated 35 runs per dumpcycle" in the last line when I had > >runspercycle as 5 weeks. When I removed 'weeks' from that line -- > >then it showed correct value -- 5 runs per dumpcycle. > > runspercycle does indeed take a unit if specified. >
Glad I said "I think" rather than "It doesn't!" Thanks for correcting that. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
