On Tuesday 23 December 2003 08:53, Kurt Yoder wrote: >Eric Siegerman said: > ><snipped> > >>> Can I just remove all references to changer-src from the >>> configure script? I don't need a tape changer. Would I break >>> amanda-server if >>> I tried to compile without changer-src? >> >> Not sure; try it and see... > >OK, removed all from configure, did make clean, re-ran configure, >ran make. Everything compiles OK. I installed everything on another >SCO 5.0.6 machine. I add the folders and config files that the >amanda server and client look for. amcheck runs OK, so I try to run >"amlabel REDailySet1 REDS1tape01". Now I get a whole bunch of errors >like: > >"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 1: >configuration keyword expected >"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 1: end of line >expected >"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 2: >configuration keyword expected >"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 2: end of line >expected > > >for every line in the config file. I'm guessing the amanda.conf is >fine, because I copied it from a working configuration on Linux and >only changed a few specifics. Line 1 should be OK: > >org "Regency DailySet1" > >So if amlable is having trouble with this line, but this line >appears syntactically correct and doesn't cause warnings for >amcheck, doesn't it indicate some sort of trouble with my compiled >amlabel? Could commenting out changer-src have caused this? Or is it >something else?
Is there a missmatch between the system end of line convention, like one is expecting a crlf and the other is lf only? -- Cheers, Gene AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512M 99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
