Isn't there a possiblity of port conflict on the server ? Don't you have to have separate binaries on the server for the different configs if they are accessing the same ethernet interface ?
I got around this on my site by having one config backup local disks and another config backing up disks that where attached to amanda-clients != amanda-server. Was that unneccessary on my end ? > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 at 12:25pm, Toni Mueller wrote > > > I'm looking for the best way to have several drives backing up a > > network in parallel. Eg. while one drive makes a backup of machine M1, > > the next drive saves data from machine M2 and so on. All drives will be > > contained in one library, served by only one robot. Is this feasible, > > or do I have to concentrate on RAIT to sequentially back up all > > machines, but at a higher rate? > > Just use multiple amanda configs. A server can run multiple configs > simultaneously, but a client can only be in one of those configs. > > -- > Joshua Baker-LePain > Department of Biomedical Engineering > Duke University
