Sure I only tried to narrow down it as much as I could when I reported it to the linux-kernel ml. I have the same results with 2.6.6 as with 2.6.6-rc2.Hi, Andreas,
on Sonntag, 13. Juni 2004 at 15:04 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS> I have trouble upgrading from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6, I have narrowed AS> it down by trying the different rc releases. Between 2.6.6-rc1 and AS> 2.6.6-rc2 something happens that make my amanda backups fail AS> with the error [bad CONNECT response].
AS> If I do nothing else than boot to 2.6.6-rc1 from rc2 it works AS> so it seems to be somthing with the kernel that is causing the AS> trouble, but I don't know how to investigate further.
Why do you want to use 2.6.6-rc2? You want to use 2.6.6, don't you?
I have done this, I actually take the working config from 2.6.6-rc1 and copy it to 2.6.6-rc2 do "make oldconfig" answer no to any questions about new things (raw table support for iptables)
I have compiled every single kernel in the 2.6-tree for more than a year now and tested amanda-2.4.4p2 on it. I have not experienced that problem but would suggest comparing the kernel-configs.
Take the config of a kernel amanda works with and try to use this config to compile a fresh 2.6.6 for start.
Yes, but I can't understand what goes wrong. I've even flushed my iptables rules and set default policy to ACCEPT everywhere.
--
To me it seems that your non-working config just uses different ports somehow which are blocked ...?
Did you compile amanda under the new kernel? Which options did you configure it with?
Well, yes without any change in operation. Here is my configure statement:
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--libexecdir=/usr/lib/amanda \
--localstatedir=/var/lib \
--disable-dependency-tracking \
--with-user=root \
--with-group=rootThanks for taking your time and let me know if there's more things I can do.
/Andreas
