Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
So, short of recompiling to increase READ_TIMEOUT like amrecover suggests, is there any simple way to get the restore process to work faster? Is there a neat way of keeping a precomputed index of the tape somewhere so that amrestore can seek to the right image straight away?
In amanda 2.4.3 these two parameters in amanda.conf were introduced:
amrecover_do_fsf yes amrecover_check_label yes
You need both set to yes if using a vanilla 2.4.4p2 or earlier (a little bug which was fixed a few weeks later, and is in all current snapshots).
Does the client need to be >= 2.4.3 also?
I have a client running Red Hat 8.0 (amanda-client 2.4.2p2-9) and a server with RHEL-3ES (amanda-server 2.4.4p1-0.3E) and those two settings above didn't stop the timeout.
No the client is not relevant, I believe. (not yet verified in the sources)
Is the server doing an "mt fsf" or is it just reading the tape up to the matching backup image?
After how long does it time out? Is there a firewall in between maybe?
-- Paul Bijnens, Xplanation Tel +32 16 397.511 Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM Fax +32 16 397.512 http://www.xplanation.com/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *********************************************************************** * I think I've got the hang of it now: exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, * * quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, * * stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt, abort, hangup, * * PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e, kill -1 $$, shutdown, * * kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ... * * ... "Are you sure?" ... YES ... Phew ... I'm out * ***********************************************************************
