-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 29 Jul 2004 15:27, you wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > - the position of gzip in the pipeline was wrong in my view.
> >   it came after encryption meaning it was working on somewhat
> >   randomized data.  Thus the compression would likely be small.
>
> You don't have to put gzip in the pipeline.  Gpg compresses data by default
> (zlib level 6, according to gpg(1)), before doing encryption.

Excellent. Is there an official way of encrypting amanda, or just doing it 
this way?

>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                                               Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker.
> But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
> like that. -- Linus Torvalds

- -- 
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.

T +44 (0) 1224 587369
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 742001
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Open Source. Open Solutions.

http://www.suretecsystems.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBCQ9QeWseh9tzvqgRAveyAJ0QOgmbteprPFoCSZV2/hca2zm3qQCfefi2
b25SjgmJgOmbsTilzNw3ddI=
=jOaX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to