Le samedi 02 juillet 2005 à 13:31 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : > On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Eric DOUTRELEAU wrote: > > Hi > > > > with changing index to index yes it didn't solved my problem. > > > > and the output if the commands give me the same output. > > > > the only thing that i can see about the hosts that failed is that they a > > lot of > > partition to backup. > > > > one has 20 and the othr 36 > > > > > > > > Selon Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote: > > > > Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to > > > > my problems. > > > > > > > > i will test that that night > > > > > > > > thanks for your answer > > > > > > > > Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit : > > > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: > > > > > > i have a problem with index creation. > > > > > > > > > > > > i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are > > > > > > always empty. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to confirm, do you have just the word "index", > > > > > or is it "index yes"? Should be the latter. > > > Do you specify spindle numbers for those DLEs to prevent > all 20 and 36 from trying to be backed up at the same time? >
yes i did the backup are running fine it s only the index the problem > I seem to recall some problem with udp packet size and > large number of DLEs. > well it was what i was thinking of i will search the archive for that.