On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:47:25PM +0200, MATILDA MATILDA wrote: > Hi guys, > > taking the following two statements: > > > >> Seems to me that your desired behavior would be reasonable. > >Agreed, safety and time make it undesireable to my thinking. > > I have to conclude: > 1) The current behaviour is "normal" and more or less intended. ;-)
I'd not say 'intended'. More like most sites only use a single tape for each run and lots of sites don't use amverify regularly. Together that means not a lot of sites have hit the problem and none to date reported it as a complaint. > 2) At the moment there is no amanda inherent solution to my problem. Think that is correct. > 3) My wish concerning error reporting is not too strange. Not at all. > > So my question now: Is there an solution in sight or can it be implemented? > Soon as you or someone else takes an interest to change the code. Either tomorrow or sometime next year :) As Stefan so often says APAW. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
