Jon LaBadie wrote:
Even though the document reads that way, I've found it to *behave* the way you described, John. When I added a new disk to a server recently that was over 200GB, I had to increase the timeout, otherwise the dump itself would trigger the timeout and cause it to abort. Is this expected behavior? If so, should the docs be modified? Graeme |
- Re: Question about "data timeout". Erik P. Olsen
- Re: Question about "data timeout". Matt Hyclak
- Re: Question about "data timeout". Erik P. Olsen
- Re: Question about "data timeout". Jon LaBadie
- Re: Question about "data timeout". Graeme Humphries
- Re: Question about "data timeout". Paul Bijnens
