On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:02:22PM -0400, Matt Hyclak wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:08:32PM -0400, Jon LaBadie enlightened us: > > Have there been major changes/bug fixes to the taper > > algorithm "largestfit" in recent versions? I'm running > > 2.4.4, but it is a two year old snapshot and I'm seeing > > some really strange behavior. > > > > In the 2.4.5 line, dumper will now try smallest instead of first if nothing > will fit, in hopes that the smallest thing just might fit to tape. As to why > it wasn't picking the largest to begin with is beyond me. >
Nor why one of the twenty dumps that would fit was not selected. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
