Tony van der Hoff wrote:
It seems likely that this is just to do with packaging in your distro. Rebuilding the package from source using the newer library should work.Question: why this dependance on a rather ancient (2003) library? Will it hurt to stick with the symlink, or should I obtain a .2 library?
Graeme -- Graeme Humphries ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (306) 955-7075 ext. 485 My views are not the views of my employers.
