Sven Rudolph writes:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Schnoebelen) writes:
- >     I did take a quick look at chg-mtx, and to be honest,
- > I'm not sure it would be able to manage my 80 and 120 tape
- > robots. There are some interesting assumptions coded into it.
- 
- chg-zd-mtx (i guess you mean this) works fine for me with a 130
- tape changer (five Overland Neo 2000 boxes stacked together).

        No, I meant chg-mtx.  I hadn't looked at chg-zd-mtx.  It
looks a bit better.

        On the other hand, what I've got works, so I'm not
inclined to change.

--
Eric Schnoebelen                [EMAIL PROTECTED]                
http://www.cirr.com
    "Bureaucracies interpret communication as damage and route around it."
                            -- Jamie Zawinski         

Reply via email to