Sven Rudolph writes:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Schnoebelen) writes:
- > I did take a quick look at chg-mtx, and to be honest,
- > I'm not sure it would be able to manage my 80 and 120 tape
- > robots. There are some interesting assumptions coded into it.
-
- chg-zd-mtx (i guess you mean this) works fine for me with a 130
- tape changer (five Overland Neo 2000 boxes stacked together).
No, I meant chg-mtx. I hadn't looked at chg-zd-mtx. It
looks a bit better.
On the other hand, what I've got works, so I'm not
inclined to change.
--
Eric Schnoebelen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cirr.com
"Bureaucracies interpret communication as damage and route around it."
-- Jamie Zawinski