>>>>> "JL" == Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JL> I'm not sure what you were expecting amcheck to do. I was expecting it to alert me to the fact that no suitable tape was found and that I should stick a new tape in the changer. If I don't change out tapes, the backups tonight will fail. If I run amcheck -m as normal, no mail will be sent and so the operator will have no idea that it's time to stuff some new tapes in. Previously I have always use a plain drive and changed the tapes manually. If I forgot to put a new tape in, amcheck would always complain it. JL> It did not find a tape it thought was suitable to use. Your JL> tapecycle parameter looks to be greater than 7, so it wants an new JL> (eighth) tape. I understand that, but it seems that the condition isn't thought of as a problem by amcheck, hence the subject "NO PROBLEMS FOUND" and the total lack of mail when '-m' is given when in reality the system is in an error state. - J<
