On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:48:22PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > Sorry Brian, > by mistake I first sent this to you rather than to the list.
I didn't check the headers that closely but did notice they where a little different. Unfortunately I don't have the answer for you, I have yet to implement spindle numbers, but many/most of my partitions are on distinct spindles. > I "think" I know the answer, but just to confirm ... > > Are spindle numbers in the disklist tied to the host names? > I.e. is HostA (Spindle 9) considered the same, or different > spindle, as HostB (Spindle 9). > > I can think of two scenarios where it would matter, > > - with a huge disklist it would be easier to manage spindle > numbers on a host by host basis rather than across the > entire disklist > > - when different direct clients are providing access to the > same indirect client (nfs or samba) then spindle numbers > tied to the direct client host name are ineffective > > -- > Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > JG Computing > 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 > Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax) > > > -- > Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > JG Computing > 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 > Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax) --- Brian R Cuttler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Systems Support (v) 518 486-1697 Wadsworth Center (f) 518 473-6384 NYS Department of Health Help Desk 518 473-0773
