>From top:

Mem: 360M Active, 2736M Inact, 262M Wired, 148M Cache, 112M Buf, 5008K Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 784K Used, 8191M Free

I'm still getting that weird error 2, even after following Sergey's advice
and upgrading gtar to 1.16.2

--
 Mark Hennessy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:19 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Mark Hennessy
> Subject: Re: Question about gtar error 1 and scheduling
> 
> On Monday 05 February 2007 11:03, Mark Hennessy wrote:
> >The machine has 3GB of RAM and 8GB of available swap.
> >It's running FreeBSD 6.2 and AMANDA 2.51p2-20070202 with GNU tar 1.16
> > from FreeBSD ports patchlevel 2.
> >
> Humm, darn, that seems to be more than sufficient, I have a 
> gig on this 
> board & about 3GB of swap it never uses and have never seen 
> that error.
> 
> In simpler terms, that was my best shot at it.  Has anyone 
> else a clue?
> Does the boot log show all 3GB of that ram?
> 
> >--
> > Mark Hennessy
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:00 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Cc: Mark Hennessy; Jean-Louis Martineau
> >> Subject: Re: Question about gtar error 1 and scheduling
> >>
> >> On Monday 05 February 2007 09:57, Mark Hennessy wrote:
> >> >Thanks for telling me about that.  I have updated that and now it
> >> > doesn't die on error 1 anymore on a L0 backup of that disk.
> >> >
> >> >I was originally using the 2.51p2 release, not the latest 
> snapshot.
> >> >
> >> >Now I'm seeing another problem, this time with the
> >>
> >> incremental backup of
> >>
> >> > the same disk.
> >> >AMANDA and gtar try to do an L1 of that same disk and 
> this is what I
> >> > get: ? gtar: memory exhausted
> >>
> >> That's pretty plainly stated, how much ram is in that box?
> >>
> >> >? gtar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
> >> >sendbackup: error [dump (6349) /usr/local/bin/gtar returned 2]
> >> >
> >> >Any advice?
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> > Mark Hennessy
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Jean-Louis Martineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:50 AM
> >> >> To: Mark Hennessy
> >> >> Cc: Amanda Users
> >> >> Subject: Re: Question about gtar error 1 and scheduling
> >> >>
> >> >> Mark,
> >> >>
> >> >> Install latest amanda 2.5.1p2 snapshot from
> >> >> http://www.zmanda.com/community-builds.php,
> >> >> or wait for 2.5.1p3, it will be release next week.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jean-Louis
> >> >>
> >> >> Mark Hennessy wrote:
> >> >> > I'm using AMANDA 2.51p2 and gtar 1.16.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I want to make AMANDA ignore any error 1 response from gtar
> >> >>
> >> >> and react like it
> >> >>
> >> >> > has not FAILED.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This would make AMANDA accept the backup as successful with
> >> >>
> >> >> STRANGE and then
> >> >>
> >> >> > AMANDA wouldn't have to run a second attempt in the same
> >> >>
> >> >> run and then retry
> >> >>
> >> >> > the next run.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This is the error I see:
> >> >> > | Total bytes written: 129261885440 (121GiB, 2.0MiB/s)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > sendbackup: error [/usr/local/bin/gtar returned 1]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How can I do that? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm using GNU tar 1.16
> >> >> >
> >> >> > From NEWS for GNU tar 1.16:
> >> >> > version 1.16 - Sergey Poznyakoff, 2006-10-21
> >> >> >
> >> >> > * After creating an archive, tar exits with code 1 if some
> >> >>
> >> >> files were
> >> >>
> >> >> > changed while being read.  Previous versions exited with
> >> >>
> >> >> code 2 (fatal
> >> >>
> >> >> > error), and only if some files were truncated while
> >>
> >> being archived.
> >>
> >> >> > I think that due to the fact that the e-mail files are in
> >> >>
> >> >> constant flux I
> >> >>
> >> >> > have a very low chance of not getting an error code 1 no
> >> >>
> >> >> matter when I run
> >> >>
> >> >> > the backup.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> >  Mark Hennessy
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers, Gene
> >> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> >> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> >> Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
> >> message by Gene Heskett are:
> >> Copyright 2007 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers, Gene
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
> message by Gene Heskett are:
> Copyright 2007 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
> 
> 

Reply via email to