Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 à 22:42 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit : > On Friday 23 March 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 20:13 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit : > >> On Thursday 22 March 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >Hello, > >> > > >> >One backup partly failed with : > >> > > >> >FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: > >> > k400 /mnt/d_mails lev 1 FAILED [dumps way too big, 1025270 KB, > >> > must skip incremental dumps] > >> > k400 /home/jpp lev 1 FAILED [dumps way too big, 1116100 KB, > >> > must skip incremental dumps] > >> > k400 /etc lev 0 STRANGE > >> > > >> >for some other directories and machines the backup is OK. > >> >What is the problem ? > >> > > >> >Regards > >> > > >> >Storm66 > >> > >> Your kernel version please? > > > >Kernel 2.6.16 on the "master" machine, 2.6.18 and 2.6.20 on other > >machines. > > Those are clean from the effect I had in mind, except the 2.6.20.4-r1 > recent variation of 2.6.20. > > >Frank Smith asks for the size of tape I am using : it is a virtual tape > >on a separate disk with more than 100G avalaible. > > Ahh, I see. But what did you specify the size was in your HARD-DISK > definition in your amanda.conf? Even though there may 100GB available, > amanda still respects the size you set there, when doing the planning.
Hello, The Amanda disk space is set to 64 Go, but Frank Smith ask me to look at the tapesize whiwh is not set in my config (virtual tape with no type). I will try with a tapetype. Regards > >
