On 9/13/07, Francis Galiegue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One question though: is it really the role of amrecover to drive the tape > changer? Isn't that done on the server side? What if I decide to upgrade the > server to the latest 2.5.x but leave clients with 2.4.x?
Yes, that's correct -- I was trying to be brief :) That arrangement is ok, with the proviso that you can't use tape spanning on the server, or you won't be able to recover using older clients. There may be more limitations -- someone else please chime in? Dustin -- Storage Software Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
