On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> What would be the correct syntax to use in determining how many lines of
>> code there is in the current 2.6.0b2 tarball?
>
>sloccount
>
>Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
That's better, thanks Geert.
From the amanda-2.6.0b2-20080215 build tree, after the install, (which ran
just fine this morning, but I've come to expect that, once configured, then
amanda Just Works(TM)), then a make clean:
#> sloccount .
[...]
Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 152,365
Development Effort Estimate, Person-Years (Person-Months) = 39.18 (470.15)
(Basic COCOMO model, Person-Months = 2.4 * (KSLOC**1.05))
Schedule Estimate, Years (Months) = 2.16 (25.91)
(Basic COCOMO model, Months = 2.5 * (person-months**0.38))
Estimated Average Number of Developers (Effort/Schedule) = 18.15
Total Estimated Cost to Develop = $ 5,292,625
(average salary = $56,286/year, overhead = 2.40).
SLOCCount, Copyright (C) 2001-2004 David A. Wheeler
SLOCCount is Open Source Software/Free Software, licensed under the GNU GPL.
SLOCCount comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, and you are welcome to
redistribute it under certain conditions as specified by the GNU GPL license;
see the documentation for details.
Please credit this data as "generated using David A. Wheeler's 'SLOCCount'."
Which is about 1.5 times what the article I read last night said, saying that
amanda had achieved rung2 status at coverity with zero errors in its 100,000
LOC.
And with that, comes yet another tip of this old farts hat to the amanda
contributors. An amazing bunch. It has come a long way since I first tried
to set it up back in 1998, a decade ago.
Thanks to all.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Dare to be naive.
-- R. Buckminster Fuller