On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 08:29:03AM -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > My own preference is to configure the system with separate drives for > holding disk. There is no reason for them to be raid.
all backup data passes through the holding disk: doesn't it follow that the holding disk should be as reliable as possible? and doesn't that imply at least a mirrored holding disk? MTBF may be lowered, but failure of a single holding disk will not affect backups. -- Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
