---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: FL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:09 AM Subject: Re: amcheck reports amadad busy! To: Craig Dewick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It was a process that hadn't exited---since may 8th! I could not locate a .pid file. This hasn't happpened before. I somehow suspect that the amanda server ran out of space and lost touch with the clients--though this is a guess. On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Craig Dewick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/17 FL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> amanda was running fine against one client, until recently: amandad >> thinks it's busy. >> I'm not at all sure what changed or why it thinks it is busy: >> >> >> Amanda Tape Server Host Check >> ----------------------------- >> Holding disk /var/tmp/amanda: 16963120 KB disk space available, that's >> plenty >> amcheck-server: slot 28: date 20080516 label Daily028 (active tape) >> amcheck-server: slot 29: date 20080312 label Daily029 (exact label match) >> NOTE: skipping tape-writable test >> Tape Daily029 label ok >> Server check took 152.753 seconds >> >> Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check >> -------------------------------- >> ERROR: NAK m248.gc.cuny.edu: amandad busy >> Client check: 6 hosts checked in 10.798 seconds, 1 problem found >> >> (brought to you by Amanda 2.4.4p3) > > Maybe an old amandad process is still running? I don't know if amandad > creates a pid file when it's running but there might be a pid file not > deleted even though amandad has exited after the last backup run. > > Craig. > > -- > Craig Dewick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). http://lios.apana.org.au/~craig > RailZone Australia: http://www.railzone.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > The SunShack: http://www.sunshack.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > ClassicSaab: http://www.classicsaab.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
