->>In response to your message<<- --received from Dustin J. Mitchell-- > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Paul Yeatman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah, thanks! That's what coming from 2.4.4p3 will do for ya! > > > > I had a script that used the old directory naming style. I will have > > to adapt my script (likely with some effort) unless there is a way to ask > > 2.6.0 to use the old naming convention, ie. date only. > > Nope -- many of Amanda's internals are changing from version to > version. If you have scripts that depend on such things, you'd > probably be best served by keeping abreast of new releases, rather > than waiting.
Yes, I think you are correct. This is why I already started printing out pages of script code. > > Also, there's a rather flexible C module for analyzing the holding > disk. If it would help, I'd be happy to talk about SWIGging that into > perl, allowing your script to interface with it directly. Hmm, I appreciate the offer. Interesting. I guess I'd have to know more about what the C module produces to know if it would be helpful. Thanks, Dustin! Paul
