stan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:31:44AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:Stan,It's known bug, remove the line 1042.So, that element of the structure does not need to get aded to the acumulation
It's done a few line below. Jean-Louis
stan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:31:44AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:Stan,It's known bug, remove the line 1042.So, that element of the structure does not need to get aded to the acumulation
It's done a few line below. Jean-Louis