On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeas, but I thought we had worked out something that made amanda immune to > those little annoyances? Or was tar changed and the fix didn't work now?
Hard to say -- is there anything in the sendsize backup logs that would suggest why it estimated the incrementals to be so large? Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
