On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:31:47AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> stan wrote:
> >1263560285.332896: taper: changer: << 3
> >rait:{file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape3,tape:/dev/nst0}
> >1263560285.333214: taper: status = complete
> >1263560285.447278: taper: warning: Inconsistent volume labels/datestamps:
> >Got DailyDump52/20100113222821 on file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape3 against
> >DailyDump53/X on /dev/nst0.
> >1263560285.447296: taper: Device
> >rait:{file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape3,tape:/dev/nst0} error = 'Inconsistent
> >volume labels/datestamps: Got DailyDump52/20100113222821 on
> >file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape3 against DailyDump53/X on /dev/nst0.'
> >1263560285.447328: taper: Device
> >rait:{file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape3,tape:/dev/nst0} setting status
> >flag(s): DEVICE_STATUS_VOLUME_ERROR
> There is a mismatch, be sure that both changer current slot is the one
> you want.
> Do you see that error in the email report form amflush?
But I did an explict amtape DailyDump slot 4, which should have gottent me
to vtape4, and I ran an amcehcek after that and it was happy. And it's not
like amflush tried to advance the changer, as vtape3 is _before_ vtape4.
What am I missing?
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
