Am 04.04.2010 05:11, schrieb Dustin J. Mitchell: > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Nathan Stratton Treadway > <[email protected]> wrote: >> But given that the message that follows doesn't actually apply to a >> particular slot, I wonder if it would make sense just to leave off the >> "slot ?:" prefix entirely on that line of the output... > > That makes sense. Thanks for trying out the beta and sending along > feedback, Stefan and Nathan!
Additional feature request in this context: I have several amanda-installations at customer sites where some non-technical person has the job of changing tapes and gets the report-mails with the information "next tape expected: xyz". I would like to have two kinds of report-mails, one for me as admin with the full information (as in the current mail) and one for the "human tape changer" which could only consist of "please insert tape xyz now". Maybe this is only a small patch so I point at this now as amanda 3.1 is getting finished. Stefan
