On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > > ETIMEOUT must be positive > > But the manpage says: > > etimeout int > ..... A negative value will be interpreted as a total amount of time to wait > per client instead of per disk. > > Who's wrong? Manpage or program code?
Well, it was changed in this commit: commit 1a2051ece2e27fea65b9bf05dac235a7e358f52a Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <[email protected]> Date: Thu Dec 17 17:41:01 2009 +0000 * common-src/conffile.c: etimeout must be positive. * common-src/protocol.c: Fix possible timeout of 0. git-svn-id: https://amanda.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/amanda/amanda/tr...@2358 a8d146d6-cc15-0410-8900-af154a0219e0 I don't remember the motivation for the change, though - maybe JLM does. But the upshot is that it looks like the manpage was not properly updated. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
