On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Titl Erich <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here for your reference the outcome of amfetchdump does not look good
>
> subversion:/backup# amrecover

that's amrecover.

>> Is there any extra data in the dumpfile?
>
> Not that I know of. During amrecover I can observe the data stream and I
> _hope_ it is not garbled to an extent that it is not processable. It takes
> the amount of time I would expect to extract the file and send it across the
> network to the client.
>
> On the server I can extract the respective file easily and also feed it
> successfully to tar (I have not tried dump/restore anymore).

Meaning with 'mt' and 'dd'?  That's good to know!

Dustin

-- 
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com

Reply via email to