From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: January 19, 2011 14:23 > Some follow up to my previous post...
> 1. What is the correct method of removing a tape from a set and > ensuring that Amanda will use the next one in the sequence? It appears that I needed to change the tapecycle from 5 to 4 to reflect the removal of 1 tape from the set. > 2. What is the correct method of adding the tape back into the set > and, hopefully, in the same order as before? Call me peculiar but > I am partial to processing the tapes in numerical order (i.e. 1, > 2, 3, 4, 5). It appears that the amlabel command has taken care of this for me. I will know for sure after tonight's backup. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
