On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:27:39 -0700
Charles Curley <[email protected]> wrote:

> It might; see below.

Let's see..

> It is my experience that once you get the configuration files set
> up, everything is very stable.

That's good.

> Amanda does not address bare metal recovery. I, however, do.
> http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.html.

Nice article.

> The quantum unit of backup in Amanda is the Disk List entry (DLE). A
> DLE may cover more than one partition or a portion of a partition. You
> can use exclusions to further refine and nest DLEs.

That's clear.

> One thing that concerns me with appending is that if the tape or the
> tape drive goes bad during the append operation, you run the risk of
> clobbering no only the appended material but also the previous
> material. Having seen this happen, I prefer to avoid it. Tape space is
> much cheaper than your data.

I see...

> Also, with virtual tapes (vtapes in Amandaese), the question is
> meaningless. It is the total space available in the partition that is
> critical, not the "available space" on each vtape.

So, I can create as many vtapes as I like and then dump those to the
tape and they can span many tapes if required?

> One of these days your tape drive is going to wear out. You may
> find it expedient to replace it with disk drives loaded with
> vtapes. 

Well, my 'multimedia' archive is meant to be archived and here I
assume tapes, not on the movable hard disks.

> For me, the lack of vtapes in Bacula would be a show stopper.

Thank you for your input...I'm going to take a closer look at vtapes
in wiki.


Sincerely,
Gour 

-- 
“In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are
all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu)

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: CDBF17CA


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to