Downloading from http://amanda.org/download.php (which re-directs
to sourceforge) seems to work for me.



On 03/22/2011 03:47:43 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 06:34:42 PM Jon LaBadie did opine:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:28:29AM -0400, Mike Neimoyer wrote:
> > > On 03/22/2011 02:23 AM, gene heskett wrote:
> > > >So finally, linux once again has a tar that amanda can use.
> > > 
> > > Which version of amanda are you using?
> >
> amanda-3.2.1.svn.3841.tar.gz
> 
> > I think Gene does a nightly download and build and install
> > of the most recent verzion just before kicking off of amdump.
> > I think his crontab script does all of it automatically  :))
> > 
> 
> Not quite, Jon.  In fact I am rather disappointed at the turn of
> events 
> since that announcement, that was the last word from anyone about
> amanda 
> AFAIK.
> 
> In fact, after the ballyhooed 3.2.2 release, I went looking for a
> tarball I 
> could build & test, but all I could find were pre-builts for several 
> distro's, none of which I actually run here, which is the 32 bit
> version of 
> pclos-current.
> 
> The net result is that I am still running 
> amanda-3.2.1.svn.3841.tar.gz
> as 
> no new versions have been released on the zmanda site since 3-8-2011. 
> In 
> case no one has noticed, it is now 3-22-2011, 2 full weeks of 
> absolute
> 
> silence.
> 
> So I am puzzled and need to ask TPTB what is going on, specifically,
> is 
> Zmanda now out of the picture? and if so, then its time all the
> automatic 
> redirect links that wind up there were fixed to point at where ever
> the 
> snapshots _are_ being kept now.
> 
> Hello?  Knock, knock...  Anybody home? (cept us chickens)
> 
> > Hi Gene
> > 
> > jon
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers, Gene
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> <http://tinyurl.com/ddg5bz>
> <http://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html>
> If you are honest because honesty is the best policy, your honesty is 
> corrupt.
> 
> 




Reply via email to