On 9/3/11 11:25 AM, Alexis Huxley wrote:
That would be a harsh rule to enforce.
I think that depends on which you consider more important: (a) to back
up tonight, or (b) to ensure that yesterday's state is re-achievable
in the event of disaster even if that means losing today's work. I
think (b).

Ahh, but, come tomorrow, today will be yesterday. And then you may have no way of recovering to yesterday's state. ;-) So, you choose b today, and tomorrow you may have no b.

The real solution is in the Sysadmin's hands. Add some tapes to your cycle or change the configuration so that the dump cycle is shorter. It is the design of the configuration that is at fault, not the design of Amanda's planner.


Suppose my small company
backs up 7 desktop computers.  If one DLE on the next tape was
the last level 0, what should amanda do during that amdump?
It can't "tape around" the problem dump file.
I guess you think (a). Fair enough.

Should it skip the dump leaving lots of new stuff not backed up?

Go into degraded mode and hope the holding disk will hold all
the forced incrementals?

Copy the file from the tape to some archive area, hopefully
with sufficient space.
Either of the first two (plus a "your backups failed" email) would
be fine by me. The third option sounds like a second (v)tape library,
which, if we had one, we'd allocate in the first place.

IIRC, amcheck does give warnings about the impending situation.
I'd say it is up to the admin to decide how to handle it.
Ahh ... good! Still, it would be awful to come back from a long
holiday, and discover that, despite those warnings, the only full
backup *had* been overwritten and that the system itself had then
died of disk failure.

I guess the only option is to have a tapecycle big enough to cover
all eventualities, as the Tapecyle wiki page suggests.

precisely.


Thanks for the feedback!

Alexis


--
---------------

Chris Hoogendyk

-
   O__  ---- Systems Administrator
  c/ /'_ --- Biology&  Geology Departments
 (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst

<[email protected]>

---------------

Erdös 4


Reply via email to