On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:01:36AM -0500, Bryan Hodgson wrote: > > One day next week I want to prevent any level 0 dumps, and run only > incrementals for that one night. > > It's not obvious to me from the docs that 'amadmin force bump' will > actually prevent amanda from concluding that it's time for a level > 0. Would 'force bump' serve my purpose? (My guess = no.) > > There is more than one runcycle in our tape cycle, and we won't be > over-writing the most recent level 0 for any dump. > I looked at the man page and I agree the question is not addressed: "if a level 0 were due, would force-bump cause an incremental instead?"
Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie [email protected] 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (609) 477-8330 (C)
