On Nov 3, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Monday 03 November 2014 15:30:37 Debra S Baddorf did opine
> And Gene did reply:
>> I had a job that sent it’s  “I’m Finished”  email with a timestamp of 
>> 0208, but it was probably only doing tape work between  02:00  and 
>> the new  02:00. Yeah,  the last dumper  activity seems to have
>> finished at 01:26  — the first  01:26  — so only same-node taper work
>> was going on.
>> Looks like I got lucky:
>> 
>> Lets see:
>> taper.20141101080003.debug   shows the time jumping back suddenly but
>> nobody seems to care:
>> 
>> Sun Nov  2 01:54:14 2014: thd-0x8b96ff0: taper: Amanda::Taper::Scribe
>> preparing to write, part size 0, using no cache (PEOM will be fatal)
>> (splitter)  (no LEOM) Sun Nov  2 01:54:14 2014: thd-0x8b96ff0: taper:
>> Starting <Xfer@0x96d08c8 (<XferSourceHolding@0x9345938> ->
>> <XferDestTaperSplitter@0x93451e0>)> Sun Nov  2 01:54:14 2014:
>> thd-0x8b96ff0: taper: Final linkage: <XferSourceHolding@0x9345938>
>> -(PULL_BUFFER)-> <XferElementGlue@0x934d150> -(PUSH_BUFFER)->
>> <XferDestTaperSplitter@0x93451e0> Sun Nov  2 01:54:14 2014:
>> thd-0x9827c80: taper: Building type SPLIT_FILE header of 32768-32768
>> bytes with name='clxsrv.fnal.gov' disk='/export/userb' dumplevel=0 and
>> blocksize=32768 Sun Nov  2 01:00:09 2014: thd-0x8b96ff0: taper:
>> Amanda::Taper::Scribe preparing to write, part size 0, using no cache
>> (PEOM will be fatal) (splitter)  (no LEOM) Sun Nov  2 01:00:09 2014:
>> thd-0x8b96ff0: taper: Starting <Xfer@0x996c990
>> (<XferSourceHolding@0x93458c8> -> <XferDestTaperSplitter@0x9345108>)>
>> Sun Nov  2 01:00:09 2014: thd-0x8b96ff0: taper: Final linkage:
>> <XferSourceHolding@0x93458c8> -(PULL_BUFFER)->
>> <XferElementGlue@0x934d0a8> -(PUSH_BUFFER)->
>> <XferDestTaperSplitter@0x9345108> Sun Nov  2 01:00:09 2014:
>> thd-0x99d8da8: taper: Building type SPLIT_FILE header of 32768-32768
>> bytes with name='daesrv.fnal.gov' disk='/export/engines' dumplevel=0
>> and blocksize=32768 Sun Nov  2 01:04:30 2014: thd-0x8b96ff0: taper:
>> Amanda::Taper::Scribe preparing to write, part size 0, using no cache
>> (PEOM will be fatal) (splitter)  (no LEOM)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> dumper.20141101080002007.debug    seems to be temporarily not busy, 
>> but did get a QUIT command at 2:07 (if I got the AMREPORT  at 02:08,  
>> this is when every piece was wrapping up and being told to QUIT) It
>> looks like he was done transferring data at the first  01:26,  
>> remained totally ignorant of the next hour having repeated timestamps,
>> cuz he wasn’t doing anything,   and then wrote down   02:07  for the
>> QUIT  after the time had changed There was no wrapping of the
>> timestamps,  so I think there is a whole 90 minutes actually between
>> that  01:26 entry  and the 02:07  one.
>> 
>> Sun Nov  2 01:26:18 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper: stream_read_callback:
>> data is still flowing Sun Nov  2 01:26:29 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper:
>> stream_read_callback: data is still flowing Sun Nov  2 01:26:39 2014:
>> thd-0x8736368: dumper: security_stream_seterr(0x87f50d0, EOF) Sun Nov 
>> 2 01:26:39 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper:
>> security_stream_close(0x87f50d0) Sun Nov  2 01:26:39 2014:
>> thd-0x8736368: dumper: security_stream_seterr(0x87e5060, EOF) Sun Nov 
>> 2 01:26:39 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper:
>> security_stream_close(0x87e5060) Sun Nov  2 01:26:39 2014:
>> thd-0x8736368: dumper: security_stream_seterr(0x87ed098, EOF) Sun Nov 
>> 2 01:26:39 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper:
>> security_stream_close(0x87ed098) Sun Nov  2 01:26:39 2014:
>> thd-0x8736368: dumper: Building type FILE header of 32768-32768 bytes
>> with name='clxsrv.fnal.gov' disk='/mecca_head' dumplevel=0 and
>> blocksize=32768 Sun Nov  2 01:26:39 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper:
>> putresult: 3 DONE Sun Nov  2 02:07:28 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper:
>> getcmd: QUIT "" Sun Nov  2 02:07:28 2014: thd-0x8736368: dumper: pid
>> 3135 finish time Sun Nov  2 02:07:28 2014
> 
> Thanks Debra and Steve.
> 
> I guess I'll have to chalk it up to snilmerg or Murphy.  But with my 
> ancient wet ram I will likely have forgotten it by the next scheduled 
> change, the 80 year accumulation of wear & tear on my wet ram is showing I 
> fear.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Cheers, Gene Heskett


Put a sticky note on December,  with the note bearing a date of <next DST time 
change>
so that you will move that sticky note to next years calendar as soon as you 
get one!

Wet wear  work-around.
Deb

Reply via email to