Gunnar,
Do the number by DLE always differ?
Are you using a holding disk?
Can you monitor the server to find some bottleneck, memory, cpu,
network, disk I/O, ...
Jean-Louis
On 03/09/15 02:49 PM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar wrote:
Hi,
See below slow down in avg tp write rate after having upgraded amanda
from 3.2.0 to 3.3.7p1 nothing else is changed.
We are using DLT drivers SCSI and fiber connected.
Thanks Gunnar
Tape Time (hrs:min) 2:37 2:37 0:00
Tape Size (meg) 382968.9 382968.9 0.0
Tape Used (%) 324.1 324.1 0.0
DLEs Taped 462 462 0
Parts Taped 462 462 0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 41670.4 41670.4 --
(brought to you by Amanda version 3.2.0)
Tape Time (hrs:min) 4:18 4:18 0:00
Tape Size (meg) 384525.8 384525.8 0.0
Tape Used (%) 334.0 334.0 0.0
DLEs Taped 481 481 0
Parts Taped 481 481 0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 25469.2 25469.2 --
(brought to you by Amanda version 3.3.7p1)
Tape Time (hrs:min) 6:03 1:46 4:18
Tape Size (meg) 710405.4 208727.0 501678.5
Tape Used (%) 161.0 47.4 113.6
DLEs Taped 12 4 8 1:7 2:1
Parts Taped 27 8 19 1:11 2:8
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 33357.3 33701.7 33216.0
USAGE BY TAPE:
Label Time Size % DLEs Parts
Orabck-Unix-002 3:37 431135M 92.5 11 19
Orabck-Unix-003 2:25 279270M 59.9 1 8
(brought to you by Amanda version 3.3.7p1)
Tape Time (hrs:min) 3:13 0:11 3:01
Tape Size (meg) 776730.9 50668.0 726062.8
Tape Used (%) 177.9 12.6 165.3
DLEs Taped 18 4 14 1:9 2:5
Parts Taped 33 4 29 1:11 2:18
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 68857.4 77438.9 68329.0
USAGE BY TAPE:
Label Time Size % DLEs Parts
Orabck-Unix-015 1:34 392152M 84.2 4 12
Orabck-Unix-016 1:34 384579M 82.5 14 21
(brought to you by Amanda version 3.2.0)
