On 19/01/17 12:36 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: > * Jean-Louis Martineau <jmartin...@carbonite.com> [20170119 10:29]: >> On 19/01/17 09:49 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: >>> Hi,, > ... >>> >>> Question: are they any drawbacks, performance, etc, when setting >>> property "ATIME-PRESERVE" "NO" ? >> The atime of each file/dir tar read will be modified, that's means many >> write to the disk. > Hmmm, that's not good. There is a mount option on linux to completely disable atime, Maybe BSD can do it too.
> Would it be possible (and advisable) to force the client to use the BSD > tar in /usr/bin/tar rather than /usr/local/bin/gtar: > > # /usr/bin/tar --version > bsdtar 3.1.2 - libarchive 3.1.2 You can use the ambsdtar application, but I think it update the atime too. Jean-Louis Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more visit the Mimecast website.
