Hi,

I've never really understood how to make use of the amanda.conf
parameter 'taper-parallel-write'. 

I have this tape library with 2 LTO6 tape drives and in the amanda
(3.4.2) config storage section I have set taper-parallel-write=2 along
with defines for the 2 drives in the tpchanger definition:

define device "lto6-drive-0" {
  tapedev "tape:/dev/nst0"
  device-property "BLOCK_SIZE" "2 mbytes"
}
define device "lto6-drive-1" {
  tapedev "tape:/dev/nst1"
  device-property "BLOCK_SIZE" "2 mbytes"
}
define changer "neo-t48" {
  tpchanger "chg-robot:/dev/changer"
  changerfile "/opt/amanda/etc/amanda/neo-t48-state"
  property "tape-device" "0=lto6-drive-0" "1=lto6-drive-1"
  property "use-slots" "1-48"
  property "eject-before-unload" "yes"
  property "eject-delay" "20s"
  property "unload-delay" "2s"
  property "load-poll" "5s poll 20s until 180s"
  property "status-interval" "5s"
}
tpchanger "neo-t48"
define storage "bic-storage" {
...
    taper-parallel-write=2
    tpchanger "neo-t48"
}

Yet I don't see amanda using the 2 drives at the same time. Right now
there is an amdump running with a few dumps lying in the holdddisk but
only taper running...amstatus shows, among other things:

tutor172:/raid/data0     20170213213001 0   2075520m dump done, writing (17206m 
done (0.83%)) (1+11:59:48)
tutor172:/raid/data2     20170213213001 0   2091096m dump done, wait for writing
tutor172:/raid/data6     20170213213001 0   2074167m wait for dumping
tutor172:/raid/data7     20170213213001 0   2080428m dumping (35488m done 
(1.71%)) (1+11:59:48)

taped           :  29   6717716m   4026246m (166.85%) ( 54.41%)
    tape 1      :  27   3900014m   3900014m (162.35%) NEO-T48-B00029 (45 parts)
    tape 2      :   2   2817702m   2817702m (117.29%) NEO-T48-B00030 (14 parts)

7 dumpers idle  : no-diskspace
bic-storage qlen: 1
               0: writing (tutor172:/raid/data0)


Maybe there is an interaction with other parameters that nullify its
value. Any hints what I'm doing wrong and I could make that second drive
go?

Thanks,
jf

Reply via email to