You didn't say how you do the backup, you are using the GNUTAR program or the 
amgtar application? or ... ?

Read 
https://marc.info/?l=amanda-users&w=2&r=1&s=GNU+tar+estimates+for+vfat+filesystems&q=b

Try to set gnutar-list-dir to the empty string in 
/etc/amanda/$CONF/amanda-client.conf
eg.   gnutar-list-dir ""
and use the program"GNUTAR" to backup the vfat filesystem.

That will not be good for other unix filesystem, so for them, use the 
application amgtar and set the GNUTAR-LISTDIR property where you want it to 
store the files.

Let me know if it works for your vfat, and  I will add that feature to amgtar.

Jean-Louis

________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf 
of Charles Stroom <[email protected]>
Sent: February 6, 2018 5:58:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: again level 1 backup problems.

I have had level 1 problems about 4 years ago. In that case, the level
1 behaved as a level 0, so level 1 in fact did a real full backup.
I have similar problems now again, similar, but not the same.

I have amanda 3.5.5 running which on a daily base makes cycled backup
on DDS-4 tapes of my Linux PC. This included a directory ~/pictures,
which was, because of its size, split over 5 different amanda disks (say
A-E). Disks A-D each defined 1 sub-directory (via an include), while
disk E did all remaining stuff by excluding the sub-directories defined
in A-D. This went all without any hitch and no problems.

However, recently I installed a new physical disk and transferred the
whole ~/picture tree to this extra disk, which was formatted vfat, as I
wanted to have access from Windows as well. I also thought it
better to have a different amanda.conf to enable a different
tapecycle just for ~/pictures. So a new 2nd amanda.conf was made in
its own directory and the corresponding disklist only contained the A-E
disks from the other amanda setup, where they were deleted. After I did
so, the level 1 problem started in the new setup. Looking at the
solutions of 4 years ago, I could not see the reason. As tape backups
take a long time, I made a test setup with virtual tapes (with the
wiki.zmanda as starting point) and started a number of tests. After
tweeting the various parameters I got a running amanda but with very
strange results.

My initial test disklist (with only the A-E ~/picture disks) was limited
to only 1 (A) to speed up testing, it takes a couple of minutes only.
No compression is used, because a better size estimate can be
done and pictures do not compress much anyhow. The 1st backup creates a
level 0 and the subsequent test a level 1 which is done a few minutes
later. Nothing is touching the ~/picture disk in the mean time.

For disk A (results are KB):
A: level 0 6,849,090 - level 1 40

So I was quite happy, however too early. The tests with all other
disks, which I tested one-by-one and with resetting the previous
indexfile and curinfo info in between are strange.

B: level 0 8,439,510 - level 1 3,717,090
C: level 0 6,870,230 - level 1 5,837,490
D: level 0 6,093,580 - level 1 4,058,520
E: level 0 10,240,370 - level 1 10,175,430

I repeated the tests for E, D, C & A. All level 0 backups
were identical. Level 1 for E was identical, for D & C level 1 were
different in size (5% & 20&), and for A it was correct again: only
40 KB.

The ~/picture disk is mounted as:

/dev/sdc1 /home/charles/pictures vfat
defaults,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0022,nofail 0 0

And the disklist definitions for A-D are simply as:

fiume5.localnet Pictures_A /home/charles/pictures {
#
# pictures in the M10 directory
#
nocomp-generic
include "./A"
} 2

or B, C etc and "nocomp-generic" defined in amanda.conf.

After a couple of days looking at options, I am lost. So any suggestion
where or how to look for solutions are welcome. As far as I can see,
the new disklist and amanda.conf do not differ in essence from the
previous instalment when they were part of a single backup setup which
worked flawless (but with ~/pictures on a different linux formatted
disk). Strange.

Charles







--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl<http://no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl> 
(remove the "no-spam.")
This message is the property of CARBONITE, INC. and may contain confidential or 
privileged information.
If this message has been delivered to you by mistake, then do not copy or 
deliver this message to anyone.  Instead, destroy it and notify me by reply 
e-mail

Reply via email to