On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM Chris Nighswonger < cnighswon...@foundations.edu> wrote:
> > > So I've set these params back as they were before (ie. inparallel 10, > maxdumps 1) and opened the throttle on the bandwidth. We'll see if > things get better or worse tonight. I have a few more DLEs I need to > split which may help the over all problem. > The results are in: dumper0 busy : 5:25:03 ( 98.03%) dumper1 busy : 4:26:25 ( 80.35%) dumper2 busy : 4:05:57 ( 74.18%) dumper3 busy : 1:55:55 ( 34.96%) dumper4 busy : 3:21:39 ( 60.82%) dumper5 busy : 2:12:41 ( 40.02%) dumper6 busy : 1:55:50 ( 34.93%) dumper7 busy : 2:18:20 ( 41.72%) dumper8 busy : 1:57:28 ( 35.43%) dumper9 busy : 2:10:02 ( 39.22%) 0 dumpers busy : 0:06:32 ( 1.97%) 0: 0:06:32 (100.00%) 1 dumper busy : 0:58:37 ( 17.68%) 0: 0:58:37 (100.00%) 2 dumpers busy : 0:20:26 ( 6.17%) 0: 0:20:26 (100.00%) 3 dumpers busy : 0:43:21 ( 13.08%) 0: 0:43:21 (100.00%) 4 dumpers busy : 1:04:15 ( 19.38%) 0: 1:04:15 (100.00%) 5 dumpers busy : 0:05:38 ( 1.70%) 0: 0:05:38 (100.00%) 6 dumpers busy : 0:02:38 ( 0.79%) 0: 0:02:38 ( 99.99%) 7 dumpers busy : 0:12:34 ( 3.79%) 0: 0:12:34 (100.00%) 8 dumpers busy : 0:01:38 ( 0.49%) 0: 0:01:38 ( 99.99%) 9 dumpers busy : 0:00:52 ( 0.27%) 0: 0:00:52 ( 99.65%) 10 dumpers busy : 1:54:57 ( 34.67%) 0: 1:53:34 ( 98.79%) Here's a graph of the bandwidth on the trunking interface on the switch the backup server is on: [image: 192.168.x.x_1_1-day.png] As you can see, the network load is negligible even during business hours. So the giving amanda the reigns is not a problem and it looks like the dumps are running more efficiently. Comments appreciated. Kind regards, Chris
