Hi all,
Actually here at BETSOL I'm tasked with getting changes from github-git
converted into SVN commits.
Git at Github should be the main repo AFAIK. It's been a bit quiet too long to
treat it like the back end of the master-slave. So long as we have the reverse
able to work (without making a mess), then we shouldn't have a problem getting
pull-requests (which I have soon) put through in Git and then become commits in
SVN automatically (with author names etc..).
Though we would need to get admins responding to and working with merges in git.
-- CH
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <owner-amanda-
> [email protected]> On Behalf Of Chapman Flack
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 3:15 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: Amanda Hackers <[email protected]>; Ashwin Krishna
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: if to fork Amanda
>
> On 3/25/19 2:40 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > In some off-list emails the suggestion came up to prepare a
> > github-repository forked off
> >
> > https://github.com/zmanda/amanda
> >
> > (there are many:
> https://github.com/zmanda/amanda/network/members)
> >
> > *plus* the patches since early 2018 which only landed in sourceforge-svn:
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/amanda/code/7719/log/?path=
> >
> > I am currently trying to come up with that ... a bit of tooling around
> > with "git svn" etc
>
> I also am playing at that, though at the moment not working on it as
> assiduously as on some other unrelated things.
>
> I'll report here if I get a successful result that preserves the continuity
> of the
> past svn-to-git mirroring. (I won't be mad if somebody beats me to it.)
>
> Meanwhile, I have at least made sure that
>
> https://github.com/jcflack/amanda
>
> is up to date with zmanda/amanda, up through svn r7714, the last one that
> seems to have landed there.
>
> Regards,
> -Chap
