On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:10, Matěj Laitl <ma...@laitl.cz> wrote: > I'm running this through review board as there seems no general > agreement on Meta::Track:type() semantics. (Speaking of which, I'd be > most satisfied if it returned (the most specific) mime-type represented > using dedicated class that would support mimetype hierarchy)
Yeah, we need to detail this. I think originally type() was meant for display purposes only. We should add mimetype(). _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
