Barrett Normann writes: > First off, let me congratulate all the developers for making a wonderful > media player.
Indeed. > It is by far the best music player for me. I am mostly impressed by the > basic things like being able to create playlists with ease and saving > them. And also the lots of options that come along. Never done that... for me, it's things like the context tab with lyrics, wikipedia information, and the ability to rearrange the panels as I like them. To minimize space, I prefer to have two panels, one for the playlist, and one with two tabs for context and media [*]. I do not need an external tag editor. I use Amarok by global shortcuts, or by commands like 'amarok -p'. I can drag files directly from Amarok to file managers or utilities like soundKonverter. All in all, I am a very happy user. Despite the occasional problems - it often crashes on the first start, and sometimes even when I start to play a file. But normally it works fine, and I do not know a better player. Okay, I hardly know ANY other players, but I cannot imagine any more using players like XMMS/WinAmp, or the old Amarok 1. Great job, really! > But like every user i have my own rant, about the appearance of the > music player. I don't know if its because of the kde buttons and > graphics or something else. But they just make it look a tad bit > unprofessional. Hmm, I don't understand that. For me it looks great, but as I said, I do not know many other players, so maybe I just don't know what I'd be missing. But I like the KDE look, using standard widgets, not implementing someting that tries to look exactly like what an actual real HiFi system would look like. [*] http://www.wonkology.org/comp/desktop/2012-04-01/desktop2-1.png Wonko _______________________________________________ Amarok mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
