pj wrote:
I'd hesitate to call a load average of 1.02 an "overload".
There is a really good explanation (well it certainly helped me!) of
what is actually being measured in a series of articles available at:
http://www.teamquest.com/resources/gunther/ldavg1.shtml
and
http://www.teamquest.com/resources/gunther/ldavg2.shtml
To quote a point these articles make: 'The "load" is not the
utilization but the total queue length'.
So you can't treat the averages as 1.0 = 100% CPU utilisation.
Agreed. My later post describes my response to this.
I meant to emphasize the CPU load and Memory usage :)
-Matt
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
