Stephen wrote: >>>> Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/02/05 3:44 PM >>> >>Make sure that the smtpd's which get the mail back from amavisd are >>configured like this: >> >>localhost:10026 >> inet n - - - - smtpd >> -o smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts=127.0.0.0/8 >> -o smtpd_client_restrictions= >> -o smtpd_helo_restrictions= >> -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= >> -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject >> -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8 >> -o >> >receive_override_options=no_unknown_recipient_checks,no_header_body_checks >> -o content_filter= >> >>thus preventing unneeded lookups! >> >>-- >>Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 >>Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962 >>IT-Zentrum Standort CBF send no mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I asked previously on the list if re-injection back into postfix would cause > postfix to re-check the e-mail based on smtpd settings configured in > main.cf file and I was told it would not. > Following this I turned on debugging in postfix, ran an e-mail through and > it appeared it was only checked once, on it's way in on port 25, and not > when it was re-injected from amavisd-new. > Although myself and the person who advised this may be wrong, it may be > worth testing by turning on debugging in postfix to confirm, as it may > end up being an unnecessary change. > Just a thought... no disrepect to Ralf's comments. > SteveC I think it is more common to use the setup listed in http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.txt 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter= -o local_recipient_maps= -o relay_recipient_maps= -o smtpd_restriction_classes= -o smtpd_delay_reject=no -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject -o smtpd_helo_restrictions= -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject -o mynetworks_style=host -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8 -o strict_rfc821_envelopes=yes -o smtpd_client_connection_count_limit=0 -o smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit=0 -o receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks I am curious how SpamAssassin is called, I don't see any SA related timings in the TIMING examples. I think if you added more RAM, you could increase the number of processes, and concurrently, the size of the ramdrive. Gary V ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
