Mark Martinec a écrit :
...My guess is the emji.net headers were there prior to blast.com accepting
this message. ...
So it looks like existing X-Spam headers are not removed unless spam
scanning is enabled. It does not mean blast.com is scanning.
Indeed. There is no need to remove such pre-existing headers
unless one is checking for spam on his own server.
Clients should be ignoring such headers unless the
mail manager tells them otherwise.
there is one tricky case: part of mail is sent to amavisd-new, and part
is not. in this case, the headers should be removed (or modified) from
the unfiltered messages. not a big deal, but it's cleaner.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
