>Von: Clifton Royston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 05:10:06PM +0100, Miro Dietiker, MD Systems wrote: >> >I am using amavisd-new.2.3.2 and by default it has commented line under >> >"$banned_filename_re " paragraph, I just uncommented. Here is the >> >paragraph >> >MJ >> Huh ... i tried to resolve my exact version but amavisd-new supports no >> -V and my debian says no such version string, just "Version: >> 20030616p10-5" > > You have quite an old version of amavisd-new (over 2 years out of >date, as the version indicates.) It will work OK, but you might >consider upgrading. The version you run is missing many newer >features, and an upgrade might be required to use newest versions of >SpamAssassin; I forget.
Hmm ... i like mainstream packages where ever possible, but you're right, two years of outdating sounds a little obsolete.. For next days this version will remain, but I'm thinking of upgrading to a more recent version. I also use sa from debian sarge (SA version 3.0.3 with perl 5.8.4, which works perfectly for me) or do you think this is outdated too that much? With my settings (no user defined big config tables), amavisd-new uses 40MB and does a double-prefork (resulting in 120MB memory usage).. Is this also better with newer Versions - or even worse? Miro > -- Clifton ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
