Not likely.

Got these headers in autoack from email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I remember a lot of discussion on keeping up with yahoo.com relay
servers.

Maybe all SA users should just put score FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0 in local.cf
to turn it off?
If we are using domain keys and SPF, that should do it, right?

(then again, if yahoo decided to follow the rfc's with whois and abuse@
address, we would get more email from yahoo.com, right? Is that a good
thing? )


Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail.secnap.com ([10.70.1.3]) by secnap2.secnap.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
         Sun, 7 May 2006 14:15:14 -0400
Received: by mail.secnap.com (Postfix, from userid 1005)
        id 93879164841; Sun,  7 May 2006 14:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 0.mail.spammertrap.net (unknown [204.89.241.173])
        by mail.secnap.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3454416483A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  7 May 2006 14:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by 0.mail.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84305FF434
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  7 May 2006 14:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com
[216.145.48.34])
        by 0.mail.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3745FF433
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  7 May 2006 14:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from speedster.cc.kana.corp.yahoo.com
(speedster.cc.kana.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.228.28])
        by mail-relay1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/mr1) with SMTP id
k47IF9Lx064231
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 11:15:09 -0700
To: SECNAP Security Alert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [SPAM] A message from Yahoo! Customer Care
(KMM31264553V25674L0KM)
From: Yahoo! Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Yahoo! Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: KANA Response 7.0.1.142
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.834 tagged_above=2 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.894,
 BAYES_20=-0.74, DCC_CHECK=2.17, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME=0.001,
 DK_POLICY_TESTING=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=2,
DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447,
 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=1.849]
X-Spam-Score: 5.834
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2006 18:15:14.0102 (UTC)
FILETIME=[2F9DF560:01C67202]


-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
561-999-5000, ext 1131
SECNAP Network Security Corporation
Keep up to date with latest information on IT security: Real time
security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news
 


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/

Reply via email to