Michael wrote:
try
grep -r D_REJECT /etc
Maybe amavisd-new is reading a different file.
> I did mention that "it worked fine"(tm) with 2.3.3 ...
Yep.
>> If amavisd-new bounces it, the DSN will be from amavisd-new (although
>> there should not be one in this case), if D_REJECT is used, your MTA
>> will send the DSN. So, which one created it?
> Since MTA is postfix, and postfix doesn't send out these (do they?)
Yes it does.
If amavisd-new Rejected the message, the message will be from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mail Delivery System)
With the contents:
This is the Postfix program at host host.secnap.com
<...>
If amavisd-new created a bounce, it should be from
Content-filter at ${myhostname}
> Jul 3 13:13:44 0 postfix/lmtp[36184]: 079595FF408:
>> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, r
>> elay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=3, status=bounced (host
>> 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] sa
>> id: 554 5.7.1 Rejected, id=35247-07-3 - SPAM (in reply to end of DATA
>> command))
> And, one of the fixes for 2.4.2 was to use 554 and not 550, I suspect
> its amavisd-new sending the bounce/reject.
All I'm saying is amavisd-new is not bouncing the mail, it is
rejecting it. This is why $sa_dsn_cutoff_level has no effect.
How much mail is rejected by amavisd-new? And how much mail is in
your deferred queue? In other words, is it only some spam that gets
rejected, or all spam?
grep '1 Rejected' /path/to/log
qshape deferred
Gary V
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
